Running on a curved non-motorized treadmill requires a higher oxygen consumption, produces a significantly higher heart rate, and a feeling of having had a harder work out than running on a motorized treadmill although running economy is less efficient

In May 2018 researchers from the UK published the results of their study to compare the physiological and perceptual responses of running on a curved non-motorized treadmill and on a motorized treadmill. 13 male runners (average age 36 years, average weight 70 kg) first completed an initial session on a curved non-motorized treadmill followed by 5-6 sessions at increasingly higher speeds for a period of 4 minutes each. On a separate visit the individuals undertook a similar session but this time on a motorized treadmill. Results showed that running on a curved non-motorized treadmill required a higher oxygen consumption and was accompanied by a significantly higher heart rate, an altered running rhythm and a feeling of having had a harder work out than when compared to a motorized treadmill. Running economy was less efficient when using a curved non-motorized treadmill than a motorized treadmill.

Schoenmakers PPJM and Reed KE. The physiological and perceptual demands of running on a curved non-motorised treadmill: Implications for self-paced training. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May 19. [Epub ahead of print]

Leave a Reply